162
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: + +
no edit summary
:Hm, good point. I'll see if I can dig out what this sentence is based on. For now, the stub note and the fact tags are enough to say "This article should be taken with a grain of salt", but you are of course correct, and the sentence should go if it can't be backed and/or explained. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 10:33, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
:Hm, good point. I'll see if I can dig out what this sentence is based on. For now, the stub note and the fact tags are enough to say "This article should be taken with a grain of salt", but you are of course correct, and the sentence should go if it can't be backed and/or explained. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 10:33, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
:Reagan may be considered by some to be one of the US's great Presidents, but compared to the Red Cross, Martin Luther King, Mother Teresa, Desmond Tutu and the Dali Lama, I would think it would be hard to justify why he would receive the Nobel Peace Prize. --[[User:Brewer13210|Todd]] 11:22, 16 March 2007 (EDT)