333
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: +
→Common ancestor?: typo?
:::Good point - I think it's actually about 97% (though it depends exactly how you measure it). So I'll correct it (once I have checked). But whether it's 99, 97 or 33% doesn't alter the illogicality of the argument! [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 06:22, 27 March 2008 (EDT)
:::Good point - I think it's actually about 97% (though it depends exactly how you measure it). So I'll correct it (once I have checked). But whether it's 99, 97 or 33% doesn't alter the illogicality of the argument! [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 06:22, 27 March 2008 (EDT)
:::What [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] said - I think it will be around 99-97 for gorilla-human (they are very close to humans and chimps) but there is point at which you can say aha! that's too different, they couldn't have ever shared a common ancestor --[[User:Igor nz|Igor nz]] 18:35, 27 March 2008 (EDT)
:::What [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] said - I think it will be around 99-97 for gorilla-human (they are very close to humans and chimps) but there is point at which you can say aha! that's too different, they couldn't have ever shared a common ancestor --[[User:Igor nz|Igor nz]] 18:35, 27 March 2008 (EDT)
::::[I think you mean "there is '''no''' point at which you can say". I will not alter your words - but if I'm right, Igor, please amend what you wrote and then delete this note of mine. [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 05:48, 28 March 2008 (EDT)]