12
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 48:
Line 48: + +
→deletion of lawyer values
::::Did you just delete something for breaking a rule that ''doesn't exist on this site''? --[[User:Gulik5|Gulik5]] 21:32, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
::::Did you just delete something for breaking a rule that ''doesn't exist on this site''? --[[User:Gulik5|Gulik5]] 21:32, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
The CP Commandments demand the truth. Bohdan was right, IMO. However the real point is, he answered the question as to why he removed it, clearly and concisely. Editors who keep repeating and asking in several different ways are indeed just trying to be disruptive. It is the job of CP Sysops to decide those questions, "what is encyclopedic" and what isn't. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 21:40, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
The CP Commandments demand the truth. Bohdan was right, IMO. However the real point is, he answered the question as to why he removed it, clearly and concisely. Editors who keep repeating and asking in several different ways are indeed just trying to be disruptive. It is the job of CP Sysops to decide those questions, "what is encyclopedic" and what isn't. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 21:40, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
:::::Wish you still had that banhammer, don't you? What a shame! just be patient --[[User:Kajira|Kajira]] 11:18, 29 March 2008 (EDT)