Changes

I am deleting the line at the bottom of this article.  It is a bit silly.  They wouldn't be able to interact (and know about) the outside world.  Being deaf this person couldn't learn to speak. As he is blind, he couldn't learn sign language.  Because he has no sense of touch, he couldn't even learn sign language like Helen Keller, or learn through a bizarre smell or taste related system.  Funnily enough, this person wouldn't know about God (no communication).  He might be visited by God in his mind, but we couldn't know that (no communication, and brain scans wouldn't tell us is God is in his mind, only something is going on).  Of course there is the unlikely chance that a sign from God (a clear one) would let us know that our disabled friend knew about the outside world.--[[User:Phillipps|Phillipps]] 11:17, 29 March 2008 (EDT)

I am deleting the line at the bottom of this article.  It is a bit silly.  They wouldn't be able to interact (and know about) the outside world.  Being deaf this person couldn't learn to speak. As he is blind, he couldn't learn sign language.  Because he has no sense of touch, he couldn't even learn sign language like Helen Keller, or learn through a bizarre smell or taste related system.  Funnily enough, this person wouldn't know about God (no communication).  He might be visited by God in his mind, but we couldn't know that (no communication, and brain scans wouldn't tell us is God is in his mind, only something is going on).  Of course there is the unlikely chance that a sign from God (a clear one) would let us know that our disabled friend knew about the outside world.--[[User:Phillipps|Phillipps]] 11:17, 29 March 2008 (EDT)

:Sorry, I forgot to add my other point.  Are encyclopedias supposed to give hypothetical situations?--[[User:Phillipps|Phillipps]] 11:32, 29 March 2008 (EDT)

:Sorry, I forgot to add my other point.  Are encyclopedias supposed to give hypothetical situations?--[[User:Phillipps|Phillipps]] 11:32, 29 March 2008 (EDT)