Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Feminism (view source)

Revision as of 03:10, March 30, 2008

662 bytes added ,  03:10, March 30, 2008
→‎"Ideological Edits": reply
Line 189: Line 189:  
::#Quotes from a ''fictional character'' should never be used to make a point for or against feminism.
 
::#Quotes from a ''fictional character'' should never be used to make a point for or against feminism.
 
::Of these only number 1 was argued, and during this discussion there was no mention of why the source was correct, nor were any other sources raised. Numbers 2 and 3 were not argued, and number 4 was supported by HelpJazz. [[User:TheGySom|TheGySom]] 21:56, 29 March 2008 (EDT)
 
::Of these only number 1 was argued, and during this discussion there was no mention of why the source was correct, nor were any other sources raised. Numbers 2 and 3 were not argued, and number 4 was supported by HelpJazz. [[User:TheGySom|TheGySom]] 21:56, 29 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::In response to your four points above:
 +
 +
:::#The thesis of the book is clear: "it takes a village to raise a child," and by its very terms that denies the exclusive role played by parents in raising children.  The point in this entry is correct and you have not proposed alternative language that would be more accurate.
 +
:::#No, feminists do crave role reversal, as in men baking cookies and women assuming traditionally male jobs.  I'll add an example.
 +
:::#I've added an example in response to your point about dresses.
 +
:::#Your point here is not clear, and I'll look again at the entry.
 +
:::Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:10, 29 March 2008 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,565

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/417050"

Navigation menu