| Line 7: |
Line 7: |
| | * downplay, and omit from the conclusion and abstract, significant medical harms found in the study among post-abortive women<ref>See, e.g., the [[Harvard abortion study]], the Melbye study, and the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref> | | * downplay, and omit from the conclusion and abstract, significant medical harms found in the study among post-abortive women<ref>See, e.g., the [[Harvard abortion study]], the Melbye study, and the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref> |
| | * be silent when newspapers predictably exaggerate and misreport the findings of the paper<ref>See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref> | | * be silent when newspapers predictably exaggerate and misreport the findings of the paper<ref>See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref> |
| − | * in imitation of [[Hitler]]'s attempt to discredit [[Einstein]],<ref>http://www.jpands.org/vol13no1/lanfranchi.pdf</ref> invoke the power of government to deny a scientific finding<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/National_Cancer_Institute_on_Abortion</ref> | + | * in imitation of [[Hitler]]'s attempt to discredit [[Einstein]],<ref>http://www.jpands.org/vol13no1/lanfranchi.pdf</ref> invoke the power of government to deny a scientific finding<ref>[[National Cancer Institute on Abortion]]</ref> |
| | * use a demographic that is not typical of post-abortion women, and conceal that from the reported results<ref>See, e.g., [[Harvard abortion study]]</ref> | | * use a demographic that is not typical of post-abortion women, and conceal that from the reported results<ref>See, e.g., [[Harvard abortion study]]</ref> |
| | * falsely classify breast cancer victims as non-abortive by using an abortion registry, but including 10,000 women too old to be in the registry<ref>the Melbye study [http://www.jewsforlife.org/ABCs.cfm]</ref> | | * falsely classify breast cancer victims as non-abortive by using an abortion registry, but including 10,000 women too old to be in the registry<ref>the Melbye study [http://www.jewsforlife.org/ABCs.cfm]</ref> |