1,516
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 37:
Line 37: + +
→Uranium-Lead Dating
: This uses the same faulty circular reasoning the decay-based approaches. You're assuming something about aging to prove aging. It's like using a political poll today to predict the outcome of an election in a few months. For obvious reasons, that approach is often wrong.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:43, 8 March 2008 (EST)
: This uses the same faulty circular reasoning the decay-based approaches. You're assuming something about aging to prove aging. It's like using a political poll today to predict the outcome of an election in a few months. For obvious reasons, that approach is often wrong.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:43, 8 March 2008 (EST)
:: Equating the decay of radioactive particles (which follow the laws of physics) to the behavior of voters is a false analogy. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 21:10, 30 March 2008 (EDT)
I'm sorry, but the reasons aren't obvious. What am I assuming?--[[User:Phillipps|Phillipps]] 17:25, 10 March 2008 (EDT)
I'm sorry, but the reasons aren't obvious. What am I assuming?--[[User:Phillipps|Phillipps]] 17:25, 10 March 2008 (EDT)