Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: + +
Debate:Do sysops block editing on pages when it seems their opponents are making strong points? (view source)
Revision as of 14:53, April 1, 2008
, 14:53, April 1, 2008how long has it been?
Several of these appear to have been originally protected solely for ideological reasons (see the protection log), the rest simply do not need protection. [[User:TheGySom|TheGySom]] 20:12, 25 March 2008 (EDT)
Several of these appear to have been originally protected solely for ideological reasons (see the protection log), the rest simply do not need protection. [[User:TheGySom|TheGySom]] 20:12, 25 March 2008 (EDT)
:You said "too long", so would you do me the favor of recording the '''dates''' on which the cited articles were protected? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:53, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
==Yes==
==Yes==
I have often seen otherwise benign articles (or even their '''talk pages''') locked in order to enforce a certain view. However, when I wanted to edit, they would get unlocked after asking [[User:DLerner|The user formerly known as DLerner]] 08:46, 24 March 2008 (EDT)
I have often seen otherwise benign articles (or even their '''talk pages''') locked in order to enforce a certain view. However, when I wanted to edit, they would get unlocked after asking [[User:DLerner|The user formerly known as DLerner]] 08:46, 24 March 2008 (EDT)