36
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17:
Line 17: − +
→Use of the template
: Navigation boxes such as these are designed to be put on the pages with the terms or names in the box, not in other pages. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:29, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
: Navigation boxes such as these are designed to be put on the pages with the terms or names in the box, not in other pages. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:29, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
::I agree with Philip. Its use on [[Richard Dawkins]], for example, looks just silly. The list of terms in the template has nothing to do with Dawkins. Its inclusion there looks like an attempt to make the subject of the article look as bad as possible by chucking in a load of other hate-topics (a slur-by-association), rather than an honest attempt to lead the reader to other relevant topics. Use only '''where appropriate'''. Unless of course this encyclopedia really has redefined "liberal" to mean "any viewpoint I disagree with". [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 10:35, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
::I agree with Philip. Its use on [[Richard Dawkins]], for example, looks just silly. The list of terms in the template has nothing to do with Dawkins. Its inclusion there looks like an attempt to make the subject of the article look as bad as possible by chucking in a load of other hate-topics (a slur-by-association), rather than an honest attempt to lead the reader to other relevant topics. Use only '''where appropriate'''. Unless of course this encyclopedia really has redefined "liberal" to mean "any viewpoint I disagree with". [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 10:35, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
:::Thank you, HelpJazz, for inviting me. I absolutely agree with your assessment, too. I'd also like to state that [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=418351&oldid=418334 this] statement by TK, on the matter, was RIDICULOUSLY inappropriate, and I'm offended ''for'' PJR for having to suffer through an insult like that.-[[User:DParker|DParker]] 11:29, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
:::Thank you, HelpJazz, for inviting me. I absolutely agree with PJR/HumblPi's assessments, too. I'd also like to state that [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=418351&oldid=418334 this] statement by TK, on the matter, was RIDICULOUSLY inappropriate, and I'm offended ''for'' PJR for having to suffer through an insult like that.-[[User:DParker|DParker]] 11:29, 1 April 2008 (EDT)