Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 79: Line 79:     
::::::By your reasoning then [[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']] the public schools could teach history OF the Bible. I don't think that's likely to happen. --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 14:37, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::::::By your reasoning then [[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']] the public schools could teach history OF the Bible. I don't think that's likely to happen. --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 14:37, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::::Public schools ''can'' and ''do'' teach the ''history'' of the Bible, in ''history'' class. The curriculum I am familiar with (Washington State) has a 2-week high school freshman course on the ''history'' of Biblical times, Jesus's life, etc. As a historical, literary object, the Bible is extremely important. Just like the ten Commandments have significant historical impact. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 14:54, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
4,542

edits

Navigation menu