Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 95:
Line 95: + +
→...sources?
Considering how long the article is (I'm certainly impressed!), I find it odd that the entire thing just has five external links inside the article. I'm ''totally'' not going to plaster "fact" tags through the entire thing, but I think that an article with so much information could use a few more sources. Doesn't have to be right now, but more as a general remark. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 15:32, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
Considering how long the article is (I'm certainly impressed!), I find it odd that the entire thing just has five external links inside the article. I'm ''totally'' not going to plaster "fact" tags through the entire thing, but I think that an article with so much information could use a few more sources. Doesn't have to be right now, but more as a general remark. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 15:32, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
:Well, the order is for originality, which is what is here for the most part...but whether incorporated into the text or not, the article could benefit from additional sources. There are extensive links at the bottom of the article for internet info, but what I want are books from at least 50 years or more ago to include in the reference section. The article itself, which is laid out to be just ''about'' the Bible and a brief on its history, should remain the same without any of the controversial stuff others think has to be included...that is a subject for separate articles. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:39, 16 March 2007 (EDT)