49
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 349:
Line 349: + + + +
Talk:Charles Darwin/Archive 1 (view source)
Revision as of 01:43, April 2, 2008
, 01:43, April 2, 2008Darwin-Wife Relationship
:It seems this is more attack tract than informative article. When the POV colors ever fact or non fact inserted here, it defeats the pupose of saying this is a reference work. Maybe "Essay" should be added to the top of it? --[[User:MattM|MattM]] 22:25, 1 October 2007 (EDT)
:It seems this is more attack tract than informative article. When the POV colors ever fact or non fact inserted here, it defeats the pupose of saying this is a reference work. Maybe "Essay" should be added to the top of it? --[[User:MattM|MattM]] 22:25, 1 October 2007 (EDT)
:::You merely said "it seems" and cited no support for your contentions. Rather a weak defense of your position, wasn't it? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:30, 1 October 2007 (EDT)
:::You merely said "it seems" and cited no support for your contentions. Rather a weak defense of your position, wasn't it? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:30, 1 October 2007 (EDT)
== Darwin-Wife Relationship ==
How is the judgemental representation of Darwin's correspondence to his wife relevent?