Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 84:
Line 84: + + + + + + + +
big, hairy mess
Toning down one's tactics and taking a more mild approach to an issue is not the same as "renouncing" views. Your edit implied a 180 degree turn. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:55, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
Toning down one's tactics and taking a more mild approach to an issue is not the same as "renouncing" views. Your edit implied a 180 degree turn. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:55, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
==Pro-homosexuality bias==
This article is an attack on Anita Bryant, which assumes that [[homosexuality]] is neutral or benign and that Bryant supported "[[discrimination]]" against homosexuals.
One problem is that "discrimination" is not defined. In fact, it's too large an issue for this article alone to cover. The [[gay rights movement]] uses the "discrimination issue" as a wedge to gain [[special rights]] which adulterers, heterosexual fornicators, people who attempt suicide, drug addicts, school drop outs, et al., would never dream of having. They use the word ''discrimination'' as a kind of [[motto]].
These advocates seek to imply (without ever giving particulars) that homosexuality is benign and that attempts to police it are evil. Laws against adultery are based on the Bible, so having an affair is justly made illegal, but nowadays only politicians are held to account for affairs (and even then, only if their spouse doesn't defend them!). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 08:25, 2 April 2008 (EDT)