Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
295 bytes added ,  21:24, March 16, 2007
m
no edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:  
Under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the government must pay "just compensation" to the owner of the private property that is taken.  However, w"just compensation" usually does not include intangible values of the property, such as its business good will with customers or its personal sentimental value.  Often "just compensation" is set by a condemnation hearing that does not even give fair market value.
 
Under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the government must pay "just compensation" to the owner of the private property that is taken.  However, w"just compensation" usually does not include intangible values of the property, such as its business good will with customers or its personal sentimental value.  Often "just compensation" is set by a condemnation hearing that does not even give fair market value.
   −
In the decision of ''Kelo v. New London'' (2005), the U.S. Supreme Court allowed states to include "public purpose" such as increased tax revenues as a substitute for "public use" in eminent domain.  This enables towns to take private property from homeowners and small businesses to give the property to large corporations, such as large retail "box" stores like Home Depot.  This sparked a public outrage and several state courts (e.g., Michigan and Ohio) have required public use, as have several state legislators.
+
In the decision of ''Kelo v. New London'' (2005), the U.S. Supreme Court allowed states to include "public purpose" such as increased tax revenues as a substitute for "public use" in eminent domain.  This enables towns to take private property from homeowners and small businesses to give the property to large corporations, such as large retail "box" stores like Home Depot.  This sparked a public outrage and several state courts (e.g., Michigan and Ohio) have required public use, as have several state legislators. As recent history (need citation) shows, many Republican state legislators have ignored this outrage and shown their love for large corporations by using Eminent Domain to destroy small communities, hurt the common citizen, and encourage said large corporations to give them campaign donations.
    
The term "eminent domain" was first coined by [[Hugo Grotius]] in 1625.  [Note:  in a mistake in the Merriam-Webster dictionary, it says the term originated in 1783.]
 
The term "eminent domain" was first coined by [[Hugo Grotius]] in 1625.  [Note:  in a mistake in the Merriam-Webster dictionary, it says the term originated in 1783.]
7

edits

Navigation menu