199
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + + +
no edit summary
In the end, it grinds down (yet again) to what Andrew Schlafly regards as conservative and what not. In theory, I could simply change the quote to say "often awarded to conservative works" and name two examples, but then Andy would simply say that those weren't conservative works at all. So whatever, I'll leave this article alone. Have fun, Andy. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 09:35, 25 January 2008 (EST)
In the end, it grinds down (yet again) to what Andrew Schlafly regards as conservative and what not. In theory, I could simply change the quote to say "often awarded to conservative works" and name two examples, but then Andy would simply say that those weren't conservative works at all. So whatever, I'll leave this article alone. Have fun, Andy. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 09:35, 25 January 2008 (EST)
I agree; this is ridiculous. At the moment, you have a vaguely non-biased article, then jammed hamfistedly into the middle of it you have another cheap shot at liberalism. You provide two examples and therefore "prove" your point. No. No real evidence is provided; even the people who buy 8 out of 10 cats stuff wouldn't be fooled by this pathetic attack. Either provide real evidence, or remove it. Tt's that simple or you fall into the same trap of bigotry as you claim did Wikipedia.
[[User:KarlJaeger|KarlJaeger]] 06:03, 5 April 2008 (EDT)