Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: + + + + + +
proof is welcome, endless blather is discouraged
::Someone tried to [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Richard_Dawkins&curid=49668&diff=351028&oldid=351027 preemt that]. [[User:CillaHunt|CillaHunt]] 14:17, 12 December 2007 (EST)
::Someone tried to [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Richard_Dawkins&curid=49668&diff=351028&oldid=351027 preemt that]. [[User:CillaHunt|CillaHunt]] 14:17, 12 December 2007 (EST)
==[[talk:Richard Dawkins]]==
Seems like you came here merely to talk, not to contribute. I appreciate any desire you may have to clear the record, but arguing about the record is fruitless. I'm only interested in proof that Oxford followed the normal requirements for granting a [[professorship]]. What you supplied instead was an exhaustive list of the requirements themselves - but no proof that they were followed.
As I said before, if you can't supply the proof, I can only assume you don't have it. If you ever do run across such proof, don't bother to post on the talk page. Just edit the article itself; it's not protected. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:19, 6 April 2008 (EDT)