Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
381 bytes added ,  20:31, April 6, 2008
Line 606: Line 606:     
HelpJazz, I was saying just the opposite of what you (apparently) were saying.  That good examples, which actually demonstrate, are a far better learning aid than just a litany of "facts".  I would note that it appears many are overly concerned, ''albeit perhaps a well intentioned concern'', with truncating articles in CP that are "uncomfortable" to some in their uncompromising examples of [[liberal deceit]]. We see that in many places today, a few seeking to redefine, blur or minimize anything that points out uncomfortable facts about the left, and liberals in particular.  Why even a factual statement about liberal thinking is branded by some now as ''ad hominem arguments'', which seems to be a new phrase introduced to truncate any and all discussion or disagreement with liberals! --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 16:11, 6 April 2008 (EDT)
 
HelpJazz, I was saying just the opposite of what you (apparently) were saying.  That good examples, which actually demonstrate, are a far better learning aid than just a litany of "facts".  I would note that it appears many are overly concerned, ''albeit perhaps a well intentioned concern'', with truncating articles in CP that are "uncomfortable" to some in their uncompromising examples of [[liberal deceit]]. We see that in many places today, a few seeking to redefine, blur or minimize anything that points out uncomfortable facts about the left, and liberals in particular.  Why even a factual statement about liberal thinking is branded by some now as ''ad hominem arguments'', which seems to be a new phrase introduced to truncate any and all discussion or disagreement with liberals! --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 16:11, 6 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
=="The War in Iraq Is Going Well"==
 +
Isn't that a form of embraced deceit?  It's clearly ''not'' going well, and yet the Bush administration refuses to backtrack from its original position, that the war would be and essentially was won in a matter of days.  We all know that's false now.  Why do they not come out and say it?-[[User:Historian|Historian]] 16:31, 6 April 2008 (EDT)
38

edits

Navigation menu