| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | An argumentum '''''ad hominem''''' ([[Latin]]: "argument against the man"), is a [[logical fallacy]] which takes place when one argues by denegrating one's opponent, instead of actually dealing with the flaws in the form and function of the opponent's argument. | + | An ''argumentum '''ad hominem''''' ([[Latin]]: "argument against the man"), is a [[logical fallacy]] which takes place when one argues by denegrating one's opponent, instead of actually dealing with the flaws in the form and function of the opponent's argument. Note that the statement made in an ''ad hominem'' argument does not have to be false for this type of fallacy to have been committed. |
| | | | |
| | == Classical structure == | | == Classical structure == |
| Line 11: |
Line 11: |
| | The ''ad hominem'' is objectionable and usually fallacious practice because: | | The ''ad hominem'' is objectionable and usually fallacious practice because: |
| | | | |
| − | # It is an appeal to emotion rather than to fact.<ref name=heritage>[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ad%20hominem Definition of ad hominem] from ''The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language'', 4th ed., Houghton Mifflin Company, 2006 (retrieved April 9, 2007)</ref> | + | # It is an [[appeal to emotion]] rather than to fact.<ref name=heritage>[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ad%20hominem Definition of ad hominem] from ''The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language'', 4th ed., Houghton Mifflin Company, 2006 (retrieved April 9, 2007)</ref> |
| | # It introduces an irrelevant consideration.<ref name=Engel>S. Morris Engel, ''With Good Reason: An Introduction to Informal Fallacies'', 5th ed., St. Martin's Press, 1994, pp. 198-206. Retrieved April 9, 2007, from [http://www.fallacyfiles.org/adhomine.html The Fallacy Files]</ref> | | # It introduces an irrelevant consideration.<ref name=Engel>S. Morris Engel, ''With Good Reason: An Introduction to Informal Fallacies'', 5th ed., St. Martin's Press, 1994, pp. 198-206. Retrieved April 9, 2007, from [http://www.fallacyfiles.org/adhomine.html The Fallacy Files]</ref> |
| | | | |
| Line 34: |
Line 34: |
| | | | |
| | American Heritage Dictionary says: | | American Heritage Dictionary says: |
| − | :The expression now also has a looser use in referring to any personal attack, whether or not it is part of an argument, as in It isn't in the best interests of the nation for the press to attack him in this personal, ad hominem way. This use is acceptable to 65 percent of the Panel. [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ad%20hominem] | + | :The expression now also has a looser use in referring to any personal attack, whether or not it is part of an argument, as in "It isn't in the best interests of the nation for the press to attack him in this personal, ad hominem way." [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ad%20hominem] |
| | | | |
| | == References == | | == References == |
| Line 40: |
Line 40: |
| | | | |
| | == See Also == | | == See Also == |
| − | * [[Logical fallacy]]
| |
| | * [[Special pleading]] | | * [[Special pleading]] |
| | | | |
| | [[Category:Logical Fallacies]] | | [[Category:Logical Fallacies]] |