Changes

A lawsuit was filed by students who objected to being forced to watch a politically correct, pro-[[homosexual]] video that was unrelated to academics. '''Morrison v. Board of Education''', 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6373 (E.D. Ky. Feb. 17, 2006). Included in the mandatory one-hour video were dogmatic claims that homosexuality is somehow immutable and that it is wrong to object to the lifestyle. This case was a follow-up on a prior decision, ''Boyd County High School Gay Straight Alliance v. Board of Education of Boyd County'', 03-CI-17-DLB, in which a federal district court ordered a Kentucky school district to allow a "Gay Straight" club in its high school. That decision had also imposed a consent decree that required mandatory staff and student diversity training, and ordered that "a significant portion of which would be devoted to issues of sexual orientation and gender harassment."

A lawsuit was filed by students who objected to being forced to watch a [[politically correct]], pro-[[homosexual]] video that was unrelated to academics. '''Morrison v. Board of Education''', 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6373 (E.D. Ky. Feb. 17, 2006). Included in the mandatory one-hour video were dogmatic claims that homosexuality is somehow immutable and that it is wrong to object to the lifestyle. This case was a follow-up on a prior decision, ''Boyd County High School Gay Straight Alliance v. Board of Education of Boyd County'', 03-CI-17-DLB, in which a federal district court ordered a Kentucky school district to allow a "Gay Straight" club in its high school. That decision had also imposed a consent decree that required mandatory staff and student diversity training, and ordered that "a significant portion of which would be devoted to issues of sexual orientation and gender harassment."

In the new lawsuit, parents objected to the mandatory video because it "effectively forces the students to speak in agreement with the School District's view that homosexuality is a safe and healthy lifestyle that cannot be changed." Compl. 20.<ref>http://www.alliancedefensefund.org/UserDocs/MorrisonComplaint.pdf</ref>

In the new lawsuit, parents objected to the mandatory video because it "effectively forces the students to speak in agreement with the School District's view that homosexuality is a safe and healthy lifestyle that cannot be changed." Compl. 20.<ref>http://www.alliancedefensefund.org/UserDocs/MorrisonComplaint.pdf</ref>