27
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 50:
Line 50: +
Debate:Is Relativity in direct conflict with the Genesis account? (view source)
Revision as of 03:38, April 7, 2008
, 03:38, April 7, 2008→NO
Albert Einstein is not a reliable witness when it comes to interpreting relativity theory. He might have invented it, but that does not mean he understood everything. He refused to accept black holes, the expansion of the universe, and the Kaluza-Klein equations, all of which were later proved to be correct.--[[User:Felix|Felix]] 12:46, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
Albert Einstein is not a reliable witness when it comes to interpreting relativity theory. He might have invented it, but that does not mean he understood everything. He refused to accept black holes, the expansion of the universe, and the Kaluza-Klein equations, all of which were later proved to be correct.--[[User:Felix|Felix]] 12:46, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
:Careful what you say; the Kaluza-Klein theories describe extra dimensions, and have not yet been shown to exist.
:Non practicing Jew whose parents were. Although at one time a due paying member of a Jewish Congregation. Age eleven was initiated in Jewish religious ritual. Quoted as saying "I want to know how God created this world." and also "God does not play dice." As for not being reliable with other interpretations, so what? I'm pretty sure he understood more then Felix does on the subject. Still good enough for me.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 18:31, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
:Non practicing Jew whose parents were. Although at one time a due paying member of a Jewish Congregation. Age eleven was initiated in Jewish religious ritual. Quoted as saying "I want to know how God created this world." and also "God does not play dice." As for not being reliable with other interpretations, so what? I'm pretty sure he understood more then Felix does on the subject. Still good enough for me.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 18:31, 23 April 2007 (EDT)