10
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 104:
Line 104: − You are still not presenting any logical argument TerryH.+
Debate:Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it? (view source)
Revision as of 23:53, March 16, 2007
, 23:53, March 16, 2007→No
:Over my dead body.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]] 00:11, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
:Over my dead body.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]] 00:11, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
Why don't you accept any obligation to disprove global warming? A theory has been put forward and the only way to defeat a theory is to show, logically, where it is in error. Your statement that global warming is not a fact is just that, a statement. If you cannot offer a viable reason for your statement, why should I or anyone else accept your assertion? Certainly not because of your conspiracy paranoia. [[jwcddd]]
== Yes ==
== Yes ==