nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 37:
Line 37: − + − + +
Talk:Essay:Adulteress Story (view source)
Revision as of 14:39, April 7, 2008
, 14:39, April 7, 2008→What Constitutes Gospel?: unsigned x 2 and reply
== What Constitutes Gospel? ==
== What Constitutes Gospel? ==
I think Fox has a convincing take on why this may not be an addition. But even if it's not original, I have to ask how we can be sure that the Almighty wasn't working through whoever added it.
I think Fox has a convincing take on why this may not be an addition. But even if it's not original, I have to ask how we can be sure that the Almighty wasn't working through whoever added it. {{unsigned|DLaGrange}}
: Your faulty logic would apply to anything, including additions or amendments to today.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:08, 6 April 2008 (EDT)
: Your faulty logic would apply to anything, including additions or amendments to today.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:08, 6 April 2008 (EDT)
Sorry, what's the fault in it? When did God stop talking to and acting through man?
Sorry, what's the fault in it? When did God stop talking to and acting through man? {{unsigned|DLaGrange}}
: The Bible indicates that it is complete. Anything added after it is complete is not canonical. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:39, 7 April 2008 (EDT)