Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
fallacy of the excluded middle
Line 2: Line 2:     
Opponents of intelligent design go right for the throat, like a bulldog<ref>Huxley remarked to student Henry Fairfield Osborn, twentieth-century American paleontologist and director of the American Museum of Natural History, back in the mid-seventies:about Charles Darwin, "You know I have to take care of him–in fact, I have always been Darwin's bull dog." [http://aleph0.clarku.edu/huxley/guide4.html The Huxley File] </ref> or rottweiler, insisting that there is not and cannot be any distinction between intelligent design theories and the theological ideas of [[Creationism]]. For evolutionists, there are are only two possible and mutually exclusive positions:
 
Opponents of intelligent design go right for the throat, like a bulldog<ref>Huxley remarked to student Henry Fairfield Osborn, twentieth-century American paleontologist and director of the American Museum of Natural History, back in the mid-seventies:about Charles Darwin, "You know I have to take care of him–in fact, I have always been Darwin's bull dog." [http://aleph0.clarku.edu/huxley/guide4.html The Huxley File] </ref> or rottweiler, insisting that there is not and cannot be any distinction between intelligent design theories and the theological ideas of [[Creationism]]. For evolutionists, there are are only two possible and mutually exclusive positions:
−
#the scientific hypothesis life came into being and continued to evolve entirely as a result of natural forces
+
 
 +
#the scientific hypothesis that life came into being and continued to evolve entirely as a result of natural forces
 
#the religious doctrine God created life and Personally created some or species
 
#the religious doctrine God created life and Personally created some or species
  
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu