nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 30:
Line 30: +
Talk:Intelligent design controversy (view source)
Revision as of 16:02, April 8, 2008
, 16:02, April 8, 2008Not much of an argument
::And just so you know, those pesky Evilutionists have [http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB200_1.html already done the flagellum].
::And just so you know, those pesky Evilutionists have [http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB200_1.html already done the flagellum].
::[http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB301.html AND the eye.] --[[User:Gulik5|Gulik5]] 11:52, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
::[http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB301.html AND the eye.] --[[User:Gulik5|Gulik5]] 11:52, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
::: I can't at the moment think of anyone going to jail, but otherwise see [[Suppression of alternatives to evolution]]. Your claim about predictions and experiments is disputed, not self-evident truth, and your claim about the reason for its existence is rhetoric. The Talk.Origins explanations of the flagellum and the eye are just-so stories, not scientific descriptions. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 12:02, 8 April 2008 (EDT)