:::: It's the taking of ''words'' without making clear that you are ''quoting'' that is the problem. Whether they ideas are original to those sources or not is beside the point: The links give the impression that that's the case. I'm assuming that you are asking me to edit the article. I will, but only by turning the content into the quotes that they actually are. You then have two choices: A) Replace the quotes with material written in ''your own words'', or B) add introductory material to each quote so that the article does not consist almost entirely of quotes. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:28, 8 April 2008 (EDT) | :::: It's the taking of ''words'' without making clear that you are ''quoting'' that is the problem. Whether they ideas are original to those sources or not is beside the point: The links give the impression that that's the case. I'm assuming that you are asking me to edit the article. I will, but only by turning the content into the quotes that they actually are. You then have two choices: A) Replace the quotes with material written in ''your own words'', or B) add introductory material to each quote so that the article does not consist almost entirely of quotes. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:28, 8 April 2008 (EDT) |