Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
ngenious hypothetical scenarios for the evolution of complex adaptations can neither be tested experimentally nor supported by fossil histories.
Line 1: Line 1:  
'''Evidence of evolution''' comes in many shapes and forms, from [[empiricism|empirical]] evidence from the past such as [[fossil]]s to more recent [[DNA technology]] and other biochemical methods, which have provided molecular evidence for [[common descent]]. Other lines of evidence come from [[biogeography|geographical distribution]], [[comparative anatomy]], [[computer simulation]], and direct cases of evolution and [[speciation]] occurring at present, such as [[antibiotic resistance]]. Even so, many people still object to the [[theory of evolution]].
 
'''Evidence of evolution''' comes in many shapes and forms, from [[empiricism|empirical]] evidence from the past such as [[fossil]]s to more recent [[DNA technology]] and other biochemical methods, which have provided molecular evidence for [[common descent]]. Other lines of evidence come from [[biogeography|geographical distribution]], [[comparative anatomy]], [[computer simulation]], and direct cases of evolution and [[speciation]] occurring at present, such as [[antibiotic resistance]]. Even so, many people still object to the [[theory of evolution]].
 +
 +
Phillip Johnson wrote:
 +
* Ingenious hypothetical scenarios for the evolution of complex adaptations are presented to the public virtually as fact, but skeptics within science derisively call them “just-so” stories, because they can neither be tested experimentally nor supported by fossil histories. [http://www.newcriterion.com/archive/14/oct95/dennett.htm]
    
[[Category:Evolution]]
 
[[Category:Evolution]]
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu