[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:00, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:00, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
+
+
Apparently the above three quoted individuals like the story, but that's no justification for giving in to a hoax. The story has unmistakable [[liberal]] overtones and that is a "reason for doubting that it contains a true narration." Details of the story (like Jesus writing, or crediting an inherent value to age, or obtaining 100% acceptance of his teaching) are non-existent or even disproved by authentic portions of the New Testament.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:23, 8 April 2008 (EDT)