Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: + +
Darwinism is perfectly secure when it is regarded as a deduction from materialism, but remarkably insecure when it is subjected to empirical testing
{{quotebox|Despite the fact that most Americans believe that God created life, the only “origin of life” theory taught in the majority of American schools is Neo-Darwinism, which at its core holds that a random [[undirected]] process has led from non-life to all of the marvellous complexity we see in the living world. [ibid] }}
{{quotebox|Despite the fact that most Americans believe that God created life, the only “origin of life” theory taught in the majority of American schools is Neo-Darwinism, which at its core holds that a random [[undirected]] process has led from non-life to all of the marvellous complexity we see in the living world. [ibid] }}
As an explanation for design in biology, Darwinism is perfectly secure when it is regarded as a deduction from materialism, but remarkably insecure when it is subjected to empirical testing. [http://www.newcriterion.com/archive/14/oct95/dennett.htm]