Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Inspired Word of God or Not
Line 107: Line 107:     
:::::Another thought is that Aschlafly may be on to something here. If the Bible has these fabrications and additions that were added  in later, maybe we need to carefully examine the veracity of much of the Bible.--[[User:Mathewson|Mathewson]] 15:41, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
 
:::::Another thought is that Aschlafly may be on to something here. If the Bible has these fabrications and additions that were added  in later, maybe we need to carefully examine the veracity of much of the Bible.--[[User:Mathewson|Mathewson]] 15:41, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Inspired Word of God or Not ==
 +
 +
I trust God to hand The Bible to us in it's correct and accurate form. I have to. The Bible is the inspired Word of God as it has passed through many human hands. I trust God to do His work in this respect and ensure His Word is kept accurate, true and Holy. Clearly you do not trust God in this regard. I think you have crossed a line here.
 +
 +
I resign from this project and request you delete my account. I would also request (although of course I acknowledge I am in no position to demand this) that you delete my name from any part of Conservapedia to which I have contributed with the sole exception of this comment. Re-write The Bible any way you wish. Count me out. While you do it you may wish to think hard about Revelation 22:18-21
 +
 +
Amen. Good-bye, Conservapedia.
 +
Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.
 +
 +
Take solace in your [[last wordism]] of which you are so quick to accuse others. I won't be back to read it. [[User:JackThomson|JThomson]] 16:06, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
15

edits

Navigation menu