10
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 112:
Line 112: − + + + +
Talk:Essay:Adulteress Story (view source)
Revision as of 22:03, April 8, 2008
, 22:03, April 8, 2008→A reason to "conserve" the story: question for Andy
:::::: If that's your view, then you won't be relying on anything.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:07, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
:::::: If that's your view, then you won't be relying on anything.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:07, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
:: Well, I think you are exactly right. Perhaps if we critically examine the Bible, we will find some things that are correct, but much that we cannot verify, and should consider fale.--[[User:Mathewson|Mathewson]] 17:57, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
:: Well, I think you are exactly right. Perhaps if we critically examine the Bible, we will find some things that are correct, but much that we cannot verify, and should consider false.--[[User:Mathewson|Mathewson]] 17:57, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
:::::::Let's try this, Andy. You're saying that the Bible is the inerrant word of God, apart from those parts that clearly aren't. Correct? --[[User:Devotchka|Devotchka]] 18:03, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
== Inspired Word of God or Not ==
== Inspired Word of God or Not ==