Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 119:
Line 119: + +
Talk:Essay:Adulteress Story (view source)
Revision as of 23:08, April 8, 2008
, 23:08, April 8, 2008→A reason to "conserve" the story: reply
::::::I didn't advance any argument - I asked for clarification. I'll try again: you're saying that the Bible is the inerrant word of God, apart from those parts that clearly aren't. Correct? --[[User:Devotchka|Devotchka]] 19:00, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
::::::I didn't advance any argument - I asked for clarification. I'll try again: you're saying that the Bible is the inerrant word of God, apart from those parts that clearly aren't. Correct? --[[User:Devotchka|Devotchka]] 19:00, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
::::: Ah, so now you're going to try logical sophistry. "Parts that clearly aren't" in the Bible are not part of the Bible. Can you follow that?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:08, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
== Inspired Word of God or Not ==
== Inspired Word of God or Not ==