nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
6,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 152:
Line 152: + +
→Reasons opponents give for their objections
:::I agree, there's no need to completely deconstruct the whole act. I thought that the original criticism section was short and to the point. What did you think about it? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 18:59, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
:::I agree, there's no need to completely deconstruct the whole act. I thought that the original criticism section was short and to the point. What did you think about it? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 18:59, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
:I don't see how this is a black or white conservative vs. liberal issue. Opposition to portions of the Patriot Act is not inherently liberal, so I can agre with more or less the entirety of TK's post without asserting that it applies here. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 20:49, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
== Controversy section ==
== Controversy section ==
I have restored the section at [[Patriot Act/controversy]] so that we can flesh it out. Given that the controversy is mainly what the act is known for to the average citizen, we must have information on it one way or the other. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 20:13, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
I have restored the section at [[Patriot Act/controversy]] so that we can flesh it out. Given that the controversy is mainly what the act is known for to the average citizen, we must have information on it one way or the other. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 20:13, 8 April 2008 (EDT)