267
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 166:
Line 166: +
Talk:Essay:Adulteress Story (view source)
Revision as of 15:48, April 9, 2008
, 15:48, April 9, 2008God's love
::::: Good point, but due to extraordinary circumstances. The soldiers did not know any better, for example, while the adulteress surely did. Moreover, you're responding to only a small part of the conflict with Christian doctrine in the story.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:32, 9 April 2008 (EDT)
::::: Good point, but due to extraordinary circumstances. The soldiers did not know any better, for example, while the adulteress surely did. Moreover, you're responding to only a small part of the conflict with Christian doctrine in the story.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:32, 9 April 2008 (EDT)
:::::: Hooey. That God gives unconditional love and forgiveness--even to the undeserving--and that we should follow His example, is a consistent theme throughout the New Testament. --[[User:RossC|RossC]] 11:48, 9 April 2008 (EDT)
== Mosaic law ==
== Mosaic law ==
Steve, your cite to the Mosaic law is terrific. But [[liberal]] [[Christians]] will cite the adulteress story as changing Mosaic law. Indeed, the increasing reliance on this adulteress story in churches is leading to an increased opposition to the [[death penalty]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:01, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
Steve, your cite to the Mosaic law is terrific. But [[liberal]] [[Christians]] will cite the adulteress story as changing Mosaic law. Indeed, the increasing reliance on this adulteress story in churches is leading to an increased opposition to the [[death penalty]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:01, 8 April 2008 (EDT)