333
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + +
no edit summary
:Sorry, I don't understand. What is the "biology of [[mutation rates]]"? And why is that relevant to the article? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:51, 9 April 2008 (EDT)
:Sorry, I don't understand. What is the "biology of [[mutation rates]]"? And why is that relevant to the article? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:51, 9 April 2008 (EDT)
::I assume Raggs means the rate at which mutations occur, and that would be relevant if there have only been a few thousand years since the flood. But I came here to say something a little different - surely it cannot be true that "Creationist biologists accept all the biology that an evolutionist accepts" - given that evolution play such a central part in modern biology, as an underpinning theory and an observed fact. The article almost seems to be saying "Creationist biologists accept all the biology that an evolutionist accepts, ''except for the biology''"! [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 12:59, 9 April 2008 (EDT)