88
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 65:
Line 65: +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 02:05, March 17, 2007
, 02:05, March 17, 2007→Additional criticism just added concerning "Anglophilia"
::: Is Wikipedia ''in effect'' misrepresenting itself? Is there a ''large'' discrepancy between what [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] and I and even a casual contributor know Wikipedia to be and what the average reader assumes it to be? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 05:58, 13 February 2007 (EST)
::: Is Wikipedia ''in effect'' misrepresenting itself? Is there a ''large'' discrepancy between what [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] and I and even a casual contributor know Wikipedia to be and what the average reader assumes it to be? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 05:58, 13 February 2007 (EST)
:: not that it matters here, but wikipedia's style guide reccomended using american spellings for topics about american stuff and british spellings about british stuff. It's a stylistic choice, and a rational one, not a political choice. Anyone who has read the WP style guide and reads this article will realize that particular example is invalid. I wish this site wasn't called conservapedia. Its giving us a bad name. [[User:Godman|Godman]] 22:05, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
== "Debate" about reliability and disclosure ==
== "Debate" about reliability and disclosure ==