Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 176:
Line 176: + +
Talk:Essay:Adulteress Story (view source)
Revision as of 03:41, April 10, 2008
, 03:41, April 10, 2008→Inspired Word of God or Not: reply to Gulik5
::::::::When can we look forward to the new, Liberalism-free Andrew Schlafly Edition of the Bible? Hopefully, it'll contain all those Special Conservative Scriptures that never made it into the Liberal-Contaminated editions, like "Blessed are the rich in money, for they are better than the Poor", "Thou shalt not bear false witness, unless it's against a Liberal", and "Thou shalt not admit adultery."
::::::::When can we look forward to the new, Liberalism-free Andrew Schlafly Edition of the Bible? Hopefully, it'll contain all those Special Conservative Scriptures that never made it into the Liberal-Contaminated editions, like "Blessed are the rich in money, for they are better than the Poor", "Thou shalt not bear false witness, unless it's against a Liberal", and "Thou shalt not admit adultery."
::::::::All sarcasm aside, what a lot of you are worshipping [http://www.thepaincomics.com/weekly050504.htm might not be Jesus]. --[[User:Gulik5|Gulik5]] 23:18, 9 April 2008 (EDT)
::::::::All sarcasm aside, what a lot of you are worshipping [http://www.thepaincomics.com/weekly050504.htm might not be Jesus]. --[[User:Gulik5|Gulik5]] 23:18, 9 April 2008 (EDT)
::::::::: Interesting how the first quote on your link to support a [[liberal]] interpretation of [[Jesus]] is ... the phony adulteress story. Will you admit that [[liberal]]s' favorite quote from the Gospels is widely recognized not to be an authentic original?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:41, 9 April 2008 (EDT)
== Mosaic law ==
== Mosaic law ==