Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 812:
Line 812: + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 02:40, March 17, 2007
, 02:40, March 17, 2007math explained
::So, by your stated definition, a population evenly divided into Liberal and conservative (1:1) has 50% liberal bias. The population of the united states has (2:1) 33.33...% liberal bias. The population of wikipedia has (1:3) 75% liberal bias. Which is roughly '''2.25 times as much'''. Which is what everyone has been arguing to you in this discussion.
::So, by your stated definition, a population evenly divided into Liberal and conservative (1:1) has 50% liberal bias. The population of the united states has (2:1) 33.33...% liberal bias. The population of wikipedia has (1:3) 75% liberal bias. Which is roughly '''2.25 times as much'''. Which is what everyone has been arguing to you in this discussion.
::: Let me guess: liberal math at work in the above paragraph??? Is this the new new new math being taught these days?
::: 2:1 is not "33%". It is 200%. 1:3 is not 75%. It is 33%. 200% divided by 33% is ... 6. Well, whatta ya know!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:40, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
::'Heaven can be defined in a similar manner! Ha ha ha.'
::'Heaven can be defined in a similar manner! Ha ha ha.'