Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 187:
Line 187: + +
Talk:Essay:Adulteress Story (view source)
Revision as of 16:08, April 10, 2008
, 16:08, April 10, 2008→Inspired Word of God or Not: reply to Mathewson
::I do not believe that Aschlafly is making an error here. The Bible has many insertions and contradictions that have been added over the centuries. Many of them, as Aschlafly notes, were probably added by liberals. I propose that Conservapedia start a project to revert these insertions, and make a truly conservative Bible available online.--[[User:Mathewson|Mathewson]] 12:02, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
::I do not believe that Aschlafly is making an error here. The Bible has many insertions and contradictions that have been added over the centuries. Many of them, as Aschlafly notes, were probably added by liberals. I propose that Conservapedia start a project to revert these insertions, and make a truly conservative Bible available online.--[[User:Mathewson|Mathewson]] 12:02, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
::: Before this gets out of hand with [[liberal]] comments like Mathewson's, there are very, very few passages in the Bible that are of questionable authenticity. Look through the NIV (or other translation) and you'll have a hard time finding anything of questionable origin.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:08, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
== Mosaic law ==
== Mosaic law ==