Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
reply
Line 14: Line 14:     
I was curious about this.  Doesn't it serve a legitimate encyclopedic purpose to have people categorized this way?  If, for example, someone wanted to see some famous African-Americans and what they had done, wouldn't a category for that make it hugely easier - the very purpose of categories in the first place?--[[User:TomMoore|TomMoore]] 19:55, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 
I was curious about this.  Doesn't it serve a legitimate encyclopedic purpose to have people categorized this way?  If, for example, someone wanted to see some famous African-Americans and what they had done, wouldn't a category for that make it hugely easier - the very purpose of categories in the first place?--[[User:TomMoore|TomMoore]] 19:55, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
[[Conservatives]] reject racial classifications, [[affirmative action]], quotas, etc.  That's obvious.  The color of a person's skin is irrelevant.  What matters is what he thinks, believes, achieves, and loves.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:13, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,196

edits

Navigation menu