Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 191: Line 191:     
::::I do not think my comments were liberal, and I am sorry if they came off that way. I do think however, that there is much material that, as you put it, could be reverted, making the Bible a more conservative, and Christian document. Please give my proposal some thought.--[[User:Mathewson|Mathewson]] 14:21, 11 April 2008 (EDT)
 
::::I do not think my comments were liberal, and I am sorry if they came off that way. I do think however, that there is much material that, as you put it, could be reverted, making the Bible a more conservative, and Christian document. Please give my proposal some thought.--[[User:Mathewson|Mathewson]] 14:21, 11 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::Whether or not you agree with Andy's premise, it is being made based upon differences between ancient manuscripts.  It is not just deciding what he likes and doesn't like in the Bible.  Trying to equate the two is like trying to equate day and night. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 19:21, 11 April 2008 (EDT)
    
:How questionable is the origin of Matthew 19:21 (sell all that you have and give to the poor), or the bit in Mark 10:25, Luke 18:25, AND Matthew 19:24--obviously the work of not just Liberal saboteurs, but TIME-TRAVELLING COMMUNISTS!!!@!!1one!
 
:How questionable is the origin of Matthew 19:21 (sell all that you have and give to the poor), or the bit in Mark 10:25, Luke 18:25, AND Matthew 19:24--obviously the work of not just Liberal saboteurs, but TIME-TRAVELLING COMMUNISTS!!!@!!1one!
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818

edits

Navigation menu