Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
3 bytes removed ,  16:23, April 13, 2008
Line 5: Line 5:  
The making of the cross or the "signing" is understood by the churches that practice it as a "sacramental" rather than a sacrament. That is, it is something done that God uses as a blessing mixed with the faith of the believer, but it is not specifically commanded by Christ, or a specific practice of the Church of the New Testament for the Christians. To understand how it arose and what it means, the source is the Old Testament. This also provides an example of how Biblical concepts and teachings form the matter for apparently unrelated customs.
 
The making of the cross or the "signing" is understood by the churches that practice it as a "sacramental" rather than a sacrament. That is, it is something done that God uses as a blessing mixed with the faith of the believer, but it is not specifically commanded by Christ, or a specific practice of the Church of the New Testament for the Christians. To understand how it arose and what it means, the source is the Old Testament. This also provides an example of how Biblical concepts and teachings form the matter for apparently unrelated customs.
   −
It is clear that "signs of the covenant (Otot HaBrit in plural - Hebrew) were to be set up in heaven and on earth to be seen by God who faithfully would act (or refrain from acting - the rainbow of the days of Noah that He would see and "remember" and never again send a flood to destroy all life on the earth. (See [[Eucharist]] for the connection to the Lord's Supper). This idea was carried forth in the Prophet Ezekiel, "...set a sign ("mark" - King James Version)  upon the foreheads of the men who sigh and that cry for all the abominations...slay old and young...but come not near any man on whom is the mark..."  Ezek. 9:4-6. Here the sign is clearly protective. The Hebrew for "sign" here is the last letter of the Hebrew alphabet, "tav" (Even in Modern  Hebrew, tav in all its forms has something to do with sign - "label", "tag", musical note - symbol of a sound, etc.. Now, the way it  was written in Biblical days was in the form of a "t", a cross, slightly tilted, just as in the cognate languages of Hebrew of the times - Phoenecian, Canaanite, Moabite, etc. Our letter "t" comes through the Greek via the cognate of Hebrew - Phoenecian. (Modern Hebrew script is different, being in reality the Aramaic script). The sign of protection, therefore, in Ezekiel was the cross.  
+
It is clear that "signs of the covenant (Otot HaBrit in plural - Hebrew) were to be set up in heaven and on earth to be seen by God who faithfully would act (or refrain from acting - the rainbow of the days of Noah that He would see and "remember" and never again send a flood to destroy all life on the earth. (See [[Eucharist]] for the connection to the Lord's Supper). This idea was carried forth in the Prophet Ezekiel, "...set a sign ("mark" - King James Version)  upon the foreheads of the men who sigh and that cry for all the abominations...slay old and young...but come not near any man on whom is the mark..."  Ezek. 9:4-6. Here the sign is clearly protective. The Hebrew for "sign" here is the last letter of the Hebrew alphabet, "tav" (Even in Modern  Hebrew, tav in all its forms has something to do with sign - "label", "tag", musical note - symbol of a sound, etc.. Now, the way it  was written in Biblical days was in the form of a "t", a cross, slightly tilted, just as in the cognate languages of Hebrew of the times - Phoenecian, Canaanite, Moabite, etc. Our letter "t" comes through the cognate of Hebrew - Phoenecian, via Greek. (Modern Hebrew script is different, being in reality the Aramaic script). The sign of protection, therefore, in Ezekiel was the cross.  
    
The book of the Revelation in the New Testament preserves for us the same idea. Just as those deluded by the beast were to be sealed on the forehead, so the believers of the Lord are to be protected by the sign on the forehead. "Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads". Rev. 7:3. What was that sign? We do not have to guess or theorize to find out, as we have the literature of the earliest Aramaic Church, coming from the time of some of the New Testament Literature. This early Jewish Christian community see [[Aramaic Church]], prior to the work of the day, would pray their "psalms" together, and would "sign" themselves, not on their forehead as Christians of the Roman sphere were doing, but they would involve their whole body, stretching out their arms as the cross bar. And they would tell what they meant, and so the sign continued on through the centuries. This is the earliest literary mention of making the sign of the cross:
 
The book of the Revelation in the New Testament preserves for us the same idea. Just as those deluded by the beast were to be sealed on the forehead, so the believers of the Lord are to be protected by the sign on the forehead. "Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads". Rev. 7:3. What was that sign? We do not have to guess or theorize to find out, as we have the literature of the earliest Aramaic Church, coming from the time of some of the New Testament Literature. This early Jewish Christian community see [[Aramaic Church]], prior to the work of the day, would pray their "psalms" together, and would "sign" themselves, not on their forehead as Christians of the Roman sphere were doing, but they would involve their whole body, stretching out their arms as the cross bar. And they would tell what they meant, and so the sign continued on through the centuries. This is the earliest literary mention of making the sign of the cross:
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
3,189

edits

Navigation menu