| − | At the risk of 90/10 repercussions, I have re re-edited back to my original word ''science'' in the opening statement on the '''Preachology''' article. Preaching would be classified as a social scienc. The effects of preaching can be measured. A study was conducted within a Church congregation on the effects of preaching, The eighty two participants were tested in five categories: knowledge, pseudo-behavior, a subjective evaluation on the participant's act of worship, a subjective evaluation of the preacher, and semantic differential. [http://www.jstor.org/pss/1386252][[User:Wired4jesus|Wired4jesus]] 00:45, 14 April 2008 (EDT) | + | At the risk of 90/10 repercussions, I have re re-edited back to my original word '''''science''''' in the opening statement on the '''Preachology''' article. Preaching would be classified as a social science. The effects of preaching can be measured. A study was conducted within a Church congregation on the effects of preaching, The eighty two participants were tested in five categories: knowledge, pseudo-behavior, a subjective evaluation on the participant's act of worship, a subjective evaluation of the preacher, and semantic differential. [http://www.jstor.org/pss/1386252][[User:Wired4jesus|Wired4jesus]] 00:45, 14 April 2008 (EDT) |