nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 52:
Line 52: + + + + + +
Talk:Falsifiability of Creation (view source)
Revision as of 13:33, April 14, 2008
, 13:33, April 14, 2008→six twenty-four-hour days: What was in mind?
: Tolerance, see [[Creation week]]. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:03, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
: Tolerance, see [[Creation week]]. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:03, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
On that point, the article says:
{{QuoteBox|Creation as a concept is not separable from the rest of the Bible. The chief reason is that Jesus Himself attested to it, and attested to the Creation Week as consisting of six and no more than six (twenty-four-hour) days.}}
(This is after I altered it, but didn't change the point that I'm querying.) Jesus certainly quoted from the creation account in Genesis and implicitly attested to the account being historical and accurate, including an ''implicit'' endorsement of the six days (e.g. {{Bible ref|Mark|10|6}}), but I'm sure that He didn't ''explicitly'' attest to creation week consisting of six days. I'm querying what was in mind there.
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:33, 14 April 2008 (EDT)