Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,106 bytes removed ,  02:44, April 15, 2008
Line 175: Line 175:     
I agree with Phillip that this section is suspect.  Taking the real life information and incorporating it into the article is one thing, but noting ways faith has been viewed in literary works seems to be out of place. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 14:03, 11 July 2007 (EDT)
 
I agree with Phillip that this section is suspect.  Taking the real life information and incorporating it into the article is one thing, but noting ways faith has been viewed in literary works seems to be out of place. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 14:03, 11 July 2007 (EDT)
  −
There is only one area of science in which "faith" is required.  That the universe and everything in it follow a set of naturalistic laws which can be predicted and understood, though there are some we are still working on.  However, this "faith" is backed up by the fact that the universe has always, so far as we currently know, followed a set of laws.  If you have no faith in this premise then a 5 minute old universe in which all our memories have been fabricated by god becomes a possibility and science goes out the window.  A 5 minute old universe, by the way, is logically just as likely as one less than 15 billion years old.
  −
  −
To reject the theory of evolution requires more faith than to accept it because of all the evidence for the theory which must also be rejected.  Face it, based on genetics, it is statistically impossible for us to not share a common ancestor with all other mammals... Unless you think the earth is 5 minutes old and everything is a trick by god... now that requires a lot of faith... but no more than is required to believe in a 6000 year old earth or a virgin birth.
      
== Biblical Examples ==
 
== Biblical Examples ==
27

edits

Navigation menu