Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Critical response: "Objective"? I don't think you know the meaning of the word.
Line 28: Line 28:     
The stridently pro-[[evolution]] science magazine ''[[Scientific American]]'' criticized the film, calling it "intellectually dishonest".  However the review's credibility was undermined somewhat by it getting wrong the name of a key figure in the movie.<ref>Richard Sternberg was referred to as Robert Sternberg.</ref><ref>http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=ben-steins-expelled-review-john-rennie&page=1</ref>
 
The stridently pro-[[evolution]] science magazine ''[[Scientific American]]'' criticized the film, calling it "intellectually dishonest".  However the review's credibility was undermined somewhat by it getting wrong the name of a key figure in the movie.<ref>Richard Sternberg was referred to as Robert Sternberg.</ref><ref>http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=ben-steins-expelled-review-john-rennie&page=1</ref>
−
  −
The fair & balanced [[Fox News Channel|Fox News]], known for treating evangelical and fundamentalist Christians with great respect, published an objective review.<ref>[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,348468,00.html Ben Stein: Win His Career] (Second review on page) ''Roger Friedman, Fox News, April 09 2008''</ref>
      
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu