789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 728:
Line 728: − − :::The only "objective standard" that counts here is the University of Chicago's, and not yours, since they are the ones who employed him. Try looking at it this way: What if a person told you that the sysops on your site are not sysops? Why do you keep attempting to degrade Senator Obama's achievements? Like you, he attended Harvard, he has gone on to be a Senator and a candidate for the Presidency, while you are the owner and editor of Conservapedia. Oops. Maybe that explains your antipathy toward him.--[[User:Mathewson|Mathewson]] 13:33, 16 April 2008 (EDT) − ::::Hey now, that's unfair. Obama has no accomplishments that cannot be explained by affirmative action, so it's unfair to compare the two of them based on their attendance at the same school and work on the same paper.--[[User:TomMoore|TomMoore]] 13:44, 16 April 2008 (EDT) − − :::::Tom, I'm sorry. You are correct. After all, Andy only comes from a well known and wealthy political family, so he did not have the benefit of affirmative action.--[[User:Mathewson|Mathewson]] 13:55, 16 April 2008 (EDT)
Talk:Barack Hussein Obama (view source)
Revision as of 17:56, April 16, 2008
, 17:56, April 16, 2008→Reversion explained: We know the truth, I'm removing our stuff in the interest of not getting banned. Hope that's okay; if not, feel free to put it back.
:: Your comments don't add anything. Look, if it makes you feel better to believe that Obama is somehow a professor, then suit yourself. By objective standards, including the dictionary, he plainly is not and never was.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:45, 16 April 2008 (EDT)
:: Your comments don't add anything. Look, if it makes you feel better to believe that Obama is somehow a professor, then suit yourself. By objective standards, including the dictionary, he plainly is not and never was.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:45, 16 April 2008 (EDT)