Changes

"Class of one" is a legal argument under the [[Equal Protection Clause]] whereby  a plaintiff prevails by proving that it "has been intentionally treated differently from others similarly situated and that there is no rational basis for the difference in treatment."<ref>''Willowbrook v. Olech'', 528 U.S. 562, 564 (2000).</ref>

"Class of one" is a legal argument under the [[Equal Protection Clause]] whereby  a plaintiff prevails by proving that it "has been intentionally treated differently from others similarly situated and that there is no rational basis for the difference in treatment."<ref>''[[Willowbrook v. Olech]]'', 528 U.S. 562, 564 (2000).</ref>

Judge Michael McConnell has embraced a "class of one" argument in concurrence<ref>''Christian Heritage Acad. v. Okla. Secondary Sch. Activities Ass'n'', 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8186 (10th Cir. Apr. 9, 2007).</ref>

Judge Michael McConnell has embraced a "class of one" argument in concurrence<ref>''Christian Heritage Acad. v. Okla. Secondary Sch. Activities Ass'n'', 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8186 (10th Cir. Apr. 9, 2007).</ref>