Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + + + +
Talk:Evolution and science (view source)
Revision as of 18:18, April 17, 2008
, 18:18, April 17, 2008Science can be explained to a 12-year-old. I'm at least that smart.
:I'm willing to collaborate, but only if this means working together. ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:06, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
:I'm willing to collaborate, but only if this means working together. ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:06, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
::I would agree. I am not a supporter of all talk and no proof. I would be willing to do the science part, considering background and all. Personaly, I believe there is a misconception caused by all of the talking without evidence that has caused a divergence of what is truly science and what is not. Science is a difficult area to understand but yet we have so many people making statements without the background or training to fully understand what they are speaking of.--[[User:Able806|Able806]] 12:11, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
I got good marks in science class. Try me. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:18, 17 April 2008 (EDT)