165
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 37:
Line 37: + +
Debate:Is "Coercive Interrogation" consistent with Christian Values? (view source)
Revision as of 22:23, April 17, 2008
, 22:23, April 17, 2008→Transference
:::::::::So that my statement still stands from the standpoint of the rest of the world. The myopic vision of merely focusing on a single entity with ignorance to the whole seems the popular approach these days. This isn't jingoistic but just a reality check. If you know of a better country in todays world please tell us so that we may move there. Oh, but that's right, there aren't any.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:49, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
:::::::::So that my statement still stands from the standpoint of the rest of the world. The myopic vision of merely focusing on a single entity with ignorance to the whole seems the popular approach these days. This isn't jingoistic but just a reality check. If you know of a better country in todays world please tell us so that we may move there. Oh, but that's right, there aren't any.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:49, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
::::::::::First I would like to know your concept of good in a nation. Is it plenty of food, plenty of water, easily affordable housing, or is it a functioning government with a court system that convicts the guilty. Or could it be all of these things and more. Now we could argue forever on what makes one nation better than another, but it is a combination of things not one single thing. Secondly you failed to understand what I was saying. I personally feel that settling for what we have is dumb and unamerican. That is the American dream, to always strive to be better, and if the nation as a whole forgets that then I don't want to live here anymore. [[User:Rellik|Rellik]] 18:23, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
==Rebuttal to RobS==
==Rebuttal to RobS==