Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Editing the Reviews
Line 94: Line 94:     
:Probably a good idea, at least until the publicity dies down.--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 20:19, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
 
:Probably a good idea, at least until the publicity dies down.--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 20:19, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Reviews==
 +
Ed - regarding your pulling of the Time magazine review, that the fact that ID is explained on the website isn't a good reason to pull the reviewers comment.  The movie should stand or fall on its own merits, as that's all the viewer's going to see.  So while I've removed the inflammatory section you objected to, I'd ask that it be put back in - or any other quotes from any of the reviews, in fact.  These reporters are mostly the movie critics of their publications, and it's only fair to hear their comments on the movie itself, even if we don't agree with them.  [[User:MakeTime|MakeTime]] 21:07, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
19

edits

Navigation menu